China, Hong Kong SAR vs Serbia and Montenegro: Grassland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
-100 % change on previous year
in 2005
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
142nd
Serbia and Montenegro rank
142nd

Grassland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Serbia and Montenegro
-2000200400600800199120072024

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Serbia and Montenegro ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 142nd and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 142nd of 186 countries.

Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Serbia and Montenegro Difference Ahead
1990s -9.61 % change on previous year -7.95 % change on previous year 1.66 % change on previous year Serbia and Montenegro
2000s -97.68 % change on previous year 61.84 % change on previous year 159.52 % change on previous year Serbia and Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), China, Hong Kong SAR or Serbia and Montenegro?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
What is the difference in grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Serbia and Montenegro?
0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Serbia and Montenegro?
10 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 142nd and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Serbia and Montenegro: Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/serbia-and-montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/serbia-and-montenegro/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Serbia and Montenegro: Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 6,125 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.