Jordan vs New Zealand: Grassland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

Jordan
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
New Zealand
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Jordan rank
142nd
New Zealand rank
142nd

Grassland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • Jordan
  • New Zealand
-2000200400600199120072023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Zealand, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.

Jordan ranks 142nd and New Zealand ranks 142nd of 186 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s -30.59 % change on previous year -14.01 % change on previous year 16.58 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s -34.36 % change on previous year 152.37 % change on previous year 186.73 % change on previous year New Zealand
2020s -92.31 % change on previous year -33.46 % change on previous year 58.85 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Jordan or New Zealand?
Jordan, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Zealand as of 2022.
What is the difference in grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Jordan and New Zealand?
0 % change on previous year, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and New Zealand?
14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2022.
How do Jordan and New Zealand rank globally for grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
Jordan ranks 142nd and New Zealand ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs New Zealand: Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/jordan/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/jordan/new-zealand/">Jordan vs New Zealand: Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 6,125 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.