Turkmenistan vs Zimbabwe: Grassland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

Turkmenistan
-50.98 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
-49.44 % change on previous year
in 2024
Turkmenistan rank
116th
Zimbabwe rank
115th

Grassland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • Turkmenistan
  • Zimbabwe
02505007501.0k199120072024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports -49.44 % change on previous year against -50.98 % change on previous year in Turkmenistan, a difference of 1.54 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Turkmenistan ranks 116th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 186 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Turkmenistan averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turkmenistan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 56.46 % change on previous year -12.97 % change on previous year 69.43 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
2000s 137.77 % change on previous year 6.61 % change on previous year 131.16 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
2010s 55.5 % change on previous year -3.37 % change on previous year 58.87 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
2020s -50.13 % change on previous year 7.08 % change on previous year 57.21 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Turkmenistan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at -49.44 % change on previous year against -50.98 % change on previous year in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe?
1.54 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe?
30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
Turkmenistan ranks 116th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turkmenistan vs Zimbabwe: Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/turkmenistan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/turkmenistan/zimbabwe/">Turkmenistan vs Zimbabwe: Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 6,125 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.