Austria vs Mauritius: Grassland — Burning crop residues
Austria
0 t
in 2024
Mauritius
0 t
in 2024
Austria rank
135th
Mauritius rank
135th
Grassland — Burning crop residues over time
- Austria
- Mauritius
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Mauritius, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 135th and Mauritius ranks 135th of 220 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 107.73 t | 20.24 t | 87.5 t | Austria |
| 2000s | 167.71 t | 53.3 t | 114.41 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 282.41 t | 44.52 t | 237.89 t | Austria |
| 2020s | 141.21 t | 0 t | 141.21 t | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burning crop residues, Austria or Mauritius?
- Austria, at 0 t against 0 t in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burning crop residues between Austria and Mauritius?
- 0 t, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Mauritius?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Mauritius rank globally for grassland — burning crop residues?
- Austria ranks 135th and Mauritius ranks 135th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.