Libya vs Sweden: Grassland — Burning crop residues
Libya
0 t
in 2024
Sweden
0 t
in 2024
Libya rank
135th
Sweden rank
135th
Grassland — Burning crop residues over time
- Libya
- Sweden
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Sweden, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 135th and Sweden ranks 135th of 220 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,357 t | 41.09 t | 1,316 t | Libya |
| 2000s | 725.99 t | 8.85 t | 717.14 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 5,618 t | 79.69 t | 5,539 t | Libya |
| 2020s | 111.56 t | 0 t | 111.56 t | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burning crop residues, Libya or Sweden?
- Libya, at 0 t against 0 t in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burning crop residues between Libya and Sweden?
- 0 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Sweden rank globally for grassland — burning crop residues?
- Libya ranks 135th and Sweden ranks 135th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.