Solomon Islands vs Sweden: Grassland — Burning crop residues
Solomon Islands
0 t
in 2024
Sweden
0 t
in 2024
Solomon Islands rank
135th
Sweden rank
135th
Grassland — Burning crop residues over time
- Solomon Islands
- Sweden
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Sweden, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
Solomon Islands ranks 135th and Sweden ranks 135th of 220 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.6 t | 41.09 t | 36.49 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0 t | 8.85 t | 8.85 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 22.23 t | 79.69 t | 57.46 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — burning crop residues, Solomon Islands or Sweden?
- Solomon Islands, at 0 t against 0 t in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — burning crop residues between Solomon Islands and Sweden?
- 0 t, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Solomon Islands and Sweden rank globally for grassland — burning crop residues?
- Solomon Islands ranks 135th and Sweden ranks 135th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.