Chad vs Zimbabwe: Grassland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square

Chad
20.02 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
20.54 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
15th
Zimbabwe rank
13th

Grassland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square over time

  • Chad
  • Zimbabwe
010203040199020062023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 20.54 t per square kilometre against 20.02 t per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.52 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 13th of 187 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 16.97 t per square kilometre 13.23 t per square kilometre 3.74 t per square kilometre Chad
2000s 28.16 t per square kilometre 26.17 t per square kilometre 1.99 t per square kilometre Chad
2010s 25.19 t per square kilometre 28.21 t per square kilometre 3.02 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 22.4 t per square kilometre 18.02 t per square kilometre 4.37 t per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per, Chad or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 20.54 t per square kilometre against 20.02 t per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per between Chad and Zimbabwe?
0.52 t per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Chad and Zimbabwe rank globally for grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per?
Chad ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 13th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Zimbabwe: Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/chad/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/chad/zimbabwe/">Chad vs Zimbabwe: Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,279 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.