Congo vs Zimbabwe: Grassland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square

Congo
24.52 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
20.54 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
10th
Zimbabwe rank
13th

Grassland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square over time

  • Congo
  • Zimbabwe
010203040199020062023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 24.52 t per square kilometre against 20.54 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.98 t per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 13th of 187 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 14.09 t per square kilometre 13.23 t per square kilometre 0.8632 t per square kilometre Congo
2000s 22.59 t per square kilometre 26.17 t per square kilometre 3.57 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 27.72 t per square kilometre 28.21 t per square kilometre 0.4947 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 26.29 t per square kilometre 18.02 t per square kilometre 8.27 t per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per, Congo or Zimbabwe?
Congo, at 24.52 t per square kilometre against 20.54 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per between Congo and Zimbabwe?
3.98 t per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per?
Congo ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 13th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zimbabwe: Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zimbabwe/">Congo vs Zimbabwe: Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,279 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.