Namibia vs Rwanda: Grassland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square

Namibia
11.29 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
6.24 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
23rd
Rwanda rank
26th

Grassland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square over time

  • Namibia
  • Rwanda
0102030199020062023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 11.29 t per square kilometre against 6.24 t per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 5.05 t per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.8 times Rwanda's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 23rd and Rwanda ranks 26th of 187 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 10.02 t per square kilometre 2.79 t per square kilometre 7.23 t per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 17.33 t per square kilometre 3.31 t per square kilometre 14.01 t per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 17.21 t per square kilometre 6.5 t per square kilometre 10.72 t per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 13.17 t per square kilometre 6.14 t per square kilometre 7.03 t per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per, Namibia or Rwanda?
Namibia, at 11.29 t per square kilometre against 6.24 t per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per between Namibia and Rwanda?
5.05 t per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Rwanda?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Rwanda rank globally for grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per?
Namibia ranks 23rd and Rwanda ranks 26th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Rwanda: Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/namibia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/namibia/rwanda/">Namibia vs Rwanda: Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,279 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.