Togo vs Zimbabwe: Grassland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square

Togo
22.22 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
20.54 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Togo rank
12th
Zimbabwe rank
13th

Grassland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … square over time

  • Togo
  • Zimbabwe
0204060199020062023

How they compare

Togo currently reports 22.22 t per square kilometre against 20.54 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.68 t per square kilometre.

That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Togo ahead.

Togo ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 13th of 187 countries.

Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Togo Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 19.75 t per square kilometre 13.23 t per square kilometre 6.52 t per square kilometre Togo
2000s 33.48 t per square kilometre 26.17 t per square kilometre 7.32 t per square kilometre Togo
2010s 33.33 t per square kilometre 28.21 t per square kilometre 5.11 t per square kilometre Togo
2020s 30.71 t per square kilometre 18.02 t per square kilometre 12.68 t per square kilometre Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per, Togo or Zimbabwe?
Togo, at 22.22 t per square kilometre against 20.54 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per between Togo and Zimbabwe?
1.68 t per square kilometre, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Togo and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Togo and Zimbabwe rank globally for grassland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per?
Togo ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 13th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Togo vs Zimbabwe: Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/togo/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/togo/zimbabwe/">Togo vs Zimbabwe: Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,279 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Grassland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.