Aruba vs Grenada: Grassland — Emissions
Aruba
0 kt
in 2024
Grenada
0 kt
in 2024
Aruba rank
134th
Grenada rank
134th
Grassland — Emissions over time
- Aruba
- Grenada
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Grenada, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 134th and Grenada ranks 134th of 215 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Grenada |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — emissions, Aruba or Grenada?
- Aruba, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — emissions between Aruba and Grenada?
- 0 kt, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Grenada?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Grenada rank globally for grassland — emissions?
- Aruba ranks 134th and Grenada ranks 134th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.