Iceland vs Tunisia: Grassland — Emissions (CH4)
Iceland
0.0004 kt
in 2024
Tunisia
0.0002 kt
in 2024
Iceland rank
129th
Tunisia rank
132nd
Grassland — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Iceland
- Tunisia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.0004 kt against 0.0002 kt in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0002 kt.
That makes Iceland's figure about 2.0 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tunisia ahead.
Iceland ranks 129th and Tunisia ranks 132nd of 220 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0004 kt | 0.0079 kt | 0.0075 kt | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0.0016 kt | 0.0019 kt | 0.0003 kt | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0225 kt | 0.0225 kt | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0222 kt | 0.022 kt | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — emissions, Iceland or Tunisia?
- Iceland, at 0.0004 kt against 0.0002 kt in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — emissions between Iceland and Tunisia?
- 0.0002 kt, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Tunisia rank globally for grassland — emissions?
- Iceland ranks 129th and Tunisia ranks 132nd of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.