Libya vs Sweden: Grassland — Emissions
Libya
0 kt
in 2024
Sweden
0 kt
in 2024
Libya rank
134th
Sweden rank
134th
Grassland — Emissions over time
- Libya
- Sweden
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 134th and Sweden ranks 134th of 215 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0031 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.003 kt | Libya |
| 2000s | 0.0017 kt | 0 kt | 0.0016 kt | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.0129 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0127 kt | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.0003 kt | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — emissions, Libya or Sweden?
- Libya, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — emissions between Libya and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Sweden rank globally for grassland — emissions?
- Libya ranks 134th and Sweden ranks 134th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.