Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Grassland — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Eswatini
0 kt per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 kt per person
in 2024
Eswatini rank
20th
Zimbabwe rank
23rd
Grassland — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Eswatini ranks 20th and Zimbabwe ranks 23rd of 187 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — emissions (ch4), per capita, Eswatini or Zimbabwe?
- Eswatini, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — emissions (ch4), per capita between Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 0 kt per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Zimbabwe rank globally for grassland — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 20th and Zimbabwe ranks 23rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.