Belgium vs Sri Lanka: Grassland — Emissions (N2O)
Belgium
0 kt
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 kt
in 2024
Belgium rank
128th
Sri Lanka rank
128th
Grassland — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Belgium
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 128th and Sri Lanka ranks 128th of 220 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0075 kt | 0.0075 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0028 kt | 0.0027 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0002 kt | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — emissions, Belgium or Sri Lanka?
- Belgium, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — emissions between Belgium and Sri Lanka?
- 0 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sri Lanka?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Sri Lanka rank globally for grassland — emissions?
- Belgium ranks 128th and Sri Lanka ranks 128th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.