Iceland vs Serbia and Montenegro: Grassland — Emissions
Iceland
0 kt
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
0 kt
in 2005
Iceland rank
128th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
128th
Grassland — Emissions over time
- Iceland
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia and Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 128th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 128th of 220 countries.
Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0005 kt | Serbia and Montenegro |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.001 kt | 0.001 kt | Serbia and Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — emissions, Iceland or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Iceland, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — emissions between Iceland and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 0 kt, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Iceland and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for grassland — emissions?
- Iceland ranks 128th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 128th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Grassland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.