Belgium vs Mauritius: Grassland — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Belgium
0 kt per person
in 2024
Mauritius
0 kt per person
in 2024
Belgium rank
122nd
Mauritius rank
122nd
Grassland — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Belgium
- Mauritius
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mauritius ahead.
Belgium ranks 122nd and Mauritius ranks 122nd of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Belgium |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — emissions (n2o), per capita, Belgium or Mauritius?
- Belgium, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — emissions (n2o), per capita between Belgium and Mauritius?
- 0 kt per person, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Mauritius?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Mauritius rank globally for grassland — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Belgium ranks 122nd and Mauritius ranks 122nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.