Belgium vs Sri Lanka: Grassland — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Belgium
0 kt per person
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 kt per person
in 2024
Belgium rank
122nd
Sri Lanka rank
122nd
Grassland — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Belgium
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 122nd and Sri Lanka ranks 122nd of 187 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland — emissions (n2o), per capita, Belgium or Sri Lanka?
- Belgium, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland — emissions (n2o), per capita between Belgium and Sri Lanka?
- 0 kt per person, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sri Lanka?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Sri Lanka rank globally for grassland — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Belgium ranks 122nd and Sri Lanka ranks 122nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.