Which has higher grassland — emissions (n2o), per capita, Mauritius or Sweden?

Mauritius, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Sweden as of 2024.

What is the difference in grassland — emissions (n2o), per capita between Mauritius and Sweden?

0 kt per person, with Mauritius ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sweden?

35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mauritius vs Sweden: Grassland — Emissions (N2O), per capita

Mauritius

0 kt per person

in 2024

Sweden

0 kt per person

in 2024

Mauritius rank

122nd

Sweden rank

122nd

Grassland — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time

Mauritius
Sweden

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.

Mauritius ranks 122nd and Sweden ranks 122nd of 187 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mauritius	Sweden	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	—
2000s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Mauritius
2010s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Sweden
2020s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	—

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grassland — emissions (n2o), per capita, Mauritius or Sweden?: Mauritius, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Sweden as of 2024.
What is the difference in grassland — emissions (n2o), per capita between Mauritius and Sweden?: 0 kt per person, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sweden?: 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Sweden rank globally for grassland — emissions (n2o), per capita?: Mauritius ranks 122nd and Sweden ranks 122nd of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sweden: Grassland — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-emissions-n2o-per-capita/mauritius/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-emissions-n2o-per-capita/mauritius/sweden/">Mauritius vs Sweden: Grassland — Emissions (N2O), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Grassland — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Unit: kt per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 189 places, 6,469 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Grassland — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.