Canada vs Chile: Grassland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP
Canada
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Chile
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Canada rank
40th
Chile rank
39th
Grassland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Canada
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Canada, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Canada ranks 40th and Chile ranks 39th of 186 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Chile |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Chile |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Chile |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp, Canada or Chile?
- Chile, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Canada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp between Canada and Chile?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Chile?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Chile rank globally for grassland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp?
- Canada ranks 40th and Chile ranks 39th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland organic soils — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.