Chile vs Malawi: Grassland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP
Chile
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malawi
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Chile rank
39th
Malawi rank
41st
Grassland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Chile
- Malawi
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Malawi, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 39th and Malawi ranks 41st of 186 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Chile |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Chile |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Chile |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp, Chile or Malawi?
- Chile, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp between Chile and Malawi?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malawi?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Malawi rank globally for grassland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp?
- Chile ranks 39th and Malawi ranks 41st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland organic soils — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.