Croatia vs Italy: Grassland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP
Croatia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Italy
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Croatia rank
87th
Italy rank
86th
Grassland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Croatia
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Croatia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Italy's figure about 3.2 times Croatia's.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 87th and Italy ranks 86th of 186 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Italy |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Italy |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Italy |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp, Croatia or Italy?
- Italy, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp between Croatia and Italy?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Italy?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Italy rank globally for grassland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp?
- Croatia ranks 87th and Italy ranks 86th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland organic soils — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.