Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Grassland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP
Kazakhstan
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Serbia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
85th
Serbia rank
88th
Grassland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Serbia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 10.2 times Serbia's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 85th and Serbia ranks 88th of 186 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher grassland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in grassland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for grassland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp?
- Kazakhstan ranks 85th and Serbia ranks 88th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grassland organic soils — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.