Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Norway: Grassland organic soils — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate (CO2)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Norway
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
1st
Norway rank
2nd

Grassland organic soils — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate (CO2) over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Norway
0102030199120072024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Norway, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Norway ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st and Norway ranks 2nd of 32 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 3 and Norway in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4175 % change on previous year 0.0474 % change on previous year 0.37 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 0.0281 % change on previous year 0.2296 % change on previous year 0.2015 % change on previous year Norway
2010s 2.62 % change on previous year 0.0928 % change on previous year 2.53 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s -0.0315 % change on previous year -0.0791 % change on previous year 0.0476 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher grassland organic soils — emissions (co2), annual growth rate, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Norway?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Norway as of 2024.
What is the difference in grassland organic soils — emissions (co2), annual growth rate between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Norway?
0 % change on previous year, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Norway?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Norway rank globally for grassland organic soils — emissions (co2), annual growth rate?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st and Norway ranks 2nd of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Grassland organic soils — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Norway: Grassland organic soils — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-organic-soils-emissions-co2-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/grassland-organic-soils-emissions-co2-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/norway/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Norway: Grassland organic soils — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Grassland organic soils — Emissions (CO2), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
145 places, 4,735 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Grassland organic soils — Emissions (CO2). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.