Belarus vs OECD: Heat — Emissions
Heat — Emissions over time
- Belarus
- OECD
How they compare
OECD currently reports 2.11 kt against 1.43 kt in Belarus, a difference of 0.68 kt.
That makes OECD's figure about 1.5 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 3rd and OECD ranks 2nd of 38 countries.
OECD has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | OECD | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.75 kt | 3.17 kt | 0.4162 kt | OECD |
| 2000s | 1.25 kt | 2.7 kt | 1.45 kt | OECD |
| 2010s | 1.2 kt | 1.97 kt | 0.7641 kt | OECD |
| 2020s | 1.36 kt | 2.06 kt | 0.7066 kt | OECD |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher heat — emissions, Belarus or OECD?
- OECD, at 2.11 kt against 1.43 kt in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in heat — emissions between Belarus and OECD?
- 0.68 kt, with OECD ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and OECD?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and OECD rank globally for heat — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 3rd and OECD ranks 2nd of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Heat — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.