Guatemala vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area annual)

Guatemala
614.39 % change on previous year
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
72.34 % change on previous year
in 2024
Guatemala rank
5th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
7th

Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area annual) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0200400600800199120072024

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 614.39 % change on previous year against 72.34 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 542.05 % change on previous year.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 8.5 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Guatemala ranks 5th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 97 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 23.71 % change on previous year -2.76 % change on previous year 26.47 % change on previous year Guatemala
2000s 90.94 % change on previous year 31.02 % change on previous year 59.93 % change on previous year Guatemala
2010s 116.86 % change on previous year 9.62 % change on previous year 107.24 % change on previous year Guatemala
2020s 161.67 % change on previous year 8.2 % change on previous year 153.47 % change on previous year Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, annual growth rate, Guatemala or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Guatemala, at 614.39 % change on previous year against 72.34 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area, annual growth rate between Guatemala and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
542.05 % change on previous year, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
32 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area, annual growth rate?
Guatemala ranks 5th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 97 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/guatemala/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/guatemala/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Guatemala vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
121 places, 3,453 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.