Northern America vs OECD: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area annual)

Northern America
0.0016 % change on previous year
in 2024
OECD
87.73 % change on previous year
in 2024
Northern America rank
19th
OECD rank
21st

Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area annual) over time

  • Northern America
  • OECD
-2000200400600199120072024

How they compare

OECD currently reports 87.73 % change on previous year against 0.0016 % change on previous year in Northern America, a difference of 87.73 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1991 it was OECD ahead.

Northern America ranks 19th and OECD ranks 21st of 24 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Northern America averaged higher in 2 and OECD in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Northern America OECD Difference Ahead
1990s 48.73 % change on previous year 25.98 % change on previous year 22.74 % change on previous year Northern America
2000s 15.59 % change on previous year 56.56 % change on previous year 40.96 % change on previous year OECD
2010s -21.46 % change on previous year 4.27 % change on previous year 25.73 % change on previous year OECD
2020s 105.99 % change on previous year 28.16 % change on previous year 77.83 % change on previous year Northern America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, annual growth rate, Northern America or OECD?
OECD, at 87.73 % change on previous year against 0.0016 % change on previous year in Northern America as of 2024.
What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area, annual growth rate between Northern America and OECD?
87.73 % change on previous year, with OECD ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Northern America and OECD?
29 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Northern America and OECD rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area, annual growth rate?
Northern America ranks 19th and OECD ranks 21st of 24 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Northern America vs OECD: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/northern-america/oecd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/northern-america/oecd/">Northern America vs OECD: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
121 places, 3,453 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.