Australia and New Zealand vs Bahamas: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area

Australia and New Zealand
4,024 ha
in 2024
Bahamas
3,128 ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
46th
Bahamas rank
48th

Humid tropical forest — Burned Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Bahamas
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199020072024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 4,024 ha against 3,128 ha in Bahamas, a difference of 896 ha.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 46th and Bahamas ranks 48th of 218 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Bahamas Difference Ahead
1990s 19,358 ha 4,040 ha 15,318 ha Australia and New Zealand
2000s 20,520 ha 3,766 ha 16,754 ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s 27,785 ha 5,341 ha 22,445 ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 10,309 ha 2,614 ha 7,696 ha Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, Australia and New Zealand or Bahamas?
Australia and New Zealand, at 4,024 ha against 3,128 ha in Bahamas as of 2024.
What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area between Australia and New Zealand and Bahamas?
896 ha, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Bahamas?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Bahamas rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 46th and Bahamas ranks 48th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Bahamas: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/bahamas-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/bahamas-the/">Australia and New Zealand vs Bahamas: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 9,224 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.