Australia and New Zealand vs Costa Rica: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area

Australia and New Zealand
4,024 ha
in 2024
Costa Rica
5,088 ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
46th
Costa Rica rank
43rd

Humid tropical forest — Burned Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Costa Rica
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199020072024

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 5,088 ha against 4,024 ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1,064 ha.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.3 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 46th and Costa Rica ranks 43rd of 218 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1990s 19,358 ha 2,796 ha 16,562 ha Australia and New Zealand
2000s 20,520 ha 2,135 ha 18,385 ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s 27,785 ha 4,301 ha 23,484 ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 10,309 ha 4,725 ha 5,585 ha Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, Australia and New Zealand or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 5,088 ha against 4,024 ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area between Australia and New Zealand and Costa Rica?
1,064 ha, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Costa Rica?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Costa Rica rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 46th and Costa Rica ranks 43rd of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Costa Rica: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/costa-rica/">Australia and New Zealand vs Costa Rica: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 9,224 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.