Burkina Faso vs Grenada: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area
Burkina Faso
0 ha
in 2024
Grenada
0 ha
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
72nd
Grenada rank
72nd
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area over time
- Burkina Faso
- Grenada
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Grenada, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 72nd and Grenada ranks 72nd of 218 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11,144 ha | 0.8679 ha | 11,144 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 1,736 ha | 0.158 ha | 1,736 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 2.14 ha | 0 ha | 2.14 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, Burkina Faso or Grenada?
- Burkina Faso, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area between Burkina Faso and Grenada?
- 0 ha, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Grenada?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Grenada rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area?
- Burkina Faso ranks 72nd and Grenada ranks 72nd of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.