Burkina Faso vs Vanuatu: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area
Burkina Faso
0 ha
in 2024
Vanuatu
0 ha
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
72nd
Vanuatu rank
72nd
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area over time
- Burkina Faso
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Vanuatu, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 72nd and Vanuatu ranks 72nd of 218 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Vanuatu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11,144 ha | 66.62 ha | 11,078 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 1,736 ha | 66.32 ha | 1,670 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 2.14 ha | 216.06 ha | 213.92 ha | Vanuatu |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, Burkina Faso or Vanuatu?
- Burkina Faso, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Vanuatu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area between Burkina Faso and Vanuatu?
- 0 ha, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Vanuatu?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Vanuatu rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area?
- Burkina Faso ranks 72nd and Vanuatu ranks 72nd of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.