Cuba vs Philippines: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area
Cuba
6,101 ha
in 2024
Philippines
4,877 ha
in 2024
Cuba rank
42nd
Philippines rank
44th
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area over time
- Cuba
- Philippines
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 6,101 ha against 4,877 ha in Philippines, a difference of 1,224 ha.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.3 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 42nd and Philippines ranks 44th of 218 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,316 ha | 5,239 ha | 1,077 ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 7,417 ha | 5,156 ha | 2,261 ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 5,247 ha | 5,263 ha | 16.07 ha | Philippines |
| 2020s | 10,045 ha | 4,239 ha | 5,806 ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, Cuba or Philippines?
- Cuba, at 6,101 ha against 4,877 ha in Philippines as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area between Cuba and Philippines?
- 1,224 ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Philippines?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Philippines rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area?
- Cuba ranks 42nd and Philippines ranks 44th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.