Ecuador vs Mali: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area
Ecuador
85.48 ha
in 2024
Mali
42.76 ha
in 2024
Ecuador rank
66th
Mali rank
69th
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area over time
- Ecuador
- Mali
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 85.48 ha against 42.76 ha in Mali, a difference of 42.72 ha.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 2.0 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mali ahead.
Ecuador ranks 66th and Mali ranks 69th of 218 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Mali in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 141.68 ha | 49,908 ha | 49,766 ha | Mali |
| 2000s | 146.47 ha | 10,215 ha | 10,069 ha | Mali |
| 2010s | 320.55 ha | 168.9 ha | 151.65 ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 115.4 ha | 89.79 ha | 25.6 ha | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, Ecuador or Mali?
- Ecuador, at 85.48 ha against 42.76 ha in Mali as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area between Ecuador and Mali?
- 42.72 ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mali?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Mali rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area?
- Ecuador ranks 66th and Mali ranks 69th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.