Ecuador vs Sudan: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area
Ecuador
85.48 ha
in 2024
Sudan
85.51 ha
in 2024
Ecuador rank
66th
Sudan rank
65th
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area over time
- Ecuador
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 85.51 ha against 85.48 ha in Ecuador, a difference of 0.03 ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 66th and Sudan ranks 65th of 218 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 205.69 ha | 66.8 ha | 138.88 ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 115.4 ha | 179.56 ha | 64.17 ha | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, Ecuador or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 85.51 ha against 85.48 ha in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area between Ecuador and Sudan?
- 0.03 ha, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Sudan rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area?
- Ecuador ranks 66th and Sudan ranks 65th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.