Grenada vs Namibia: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area
Grenada
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Grenada rank
71st
Namibia rank
71st
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area over time
- Grenada
- Namibia
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 71st and Namibia ranks 71st of 212 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8679 ha | 0 ha | 0.8679 ha | Grenada |
| 2000s | 0.158 ha | 0 ha | 0.158 ha | Grenada |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, Grenada or Namibia?
- Grenada, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area between Grenada and Namibia?
- 0 ha, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Namibia rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area?
- Grenada ranks 71st and Namibia ranks 71st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.