Libya vs Namibia: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area
Libya
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Libya rank
71st
Namibia rank
71st
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area over time
- Libya
- Namibia
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 71st and Namibia ranks 71st of 212 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, Libya or Namibia?
- Libya, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area between Libya and Namibia?
- 0 ha, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Namibia rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area?
- Libya ranks 71st and Namibia ranks 71st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.