Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Mozambique: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
7.81 million ha
in 2024
Mozambique
613,112 ha
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
8th
Mozambique rank
6th

Humid tropical forest — Burned Area over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Mozambique
05.0M10.0M15.0M199020072024

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 7.81 million ha against 613,112 ha in Mozambique, a difference of 7.19 million ha.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 12.7 times Mozambique's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th and Mozambique ranks 6th of 31 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Mozambique Difference Ahead
1990s 7.17 million ha 489,494 ha 6.68 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 10.00 million ha 764,333 ha 9.23 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 11.33 million ha 1.12 million ha 10.21 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 8.92 million ha 729,894 ha 8.19 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Mozambique?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 7.81 million ha against 613,112 ha in Mozambique as of 2024.
What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Mozambique?
7.19 million ha, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Mozambique?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Mozambique rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th and Mozambique ranks 6th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Mozambique: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/mozambique/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Mozambique: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 9,224 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.