Mali vs Sri Lanka: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area
Mali
42.76 ha
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 ha
in 2024
Mali rank
69th
Sri Lanka rank
72nd
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area over time
- Mali
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Mali currently reports 42.76 ha against 0 ha in Sri Lanka, a difference of 42.76 ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 69th and Sri Lanka ranks 72nd of 218 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49,908 ha | 1,291 ha | 48,617 ha | Mali |
| 2000s | 10,215 ha | 190.17 ha | 10,025 ha | Mali |
| 2010s | 168.9 ha | 51.3 ha | 117.6 ha | Mali |
| 2020s | 89.79 ha | 0 ha | 89.79 ha | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, Mali or Sri Lanka?
- Mali, at 42.76 ha against 0 ha in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area between Mali and Sri Lanka?
- 42.76 ha, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Sri Lanka?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mali and Sri Lanka rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area?
- Mali ranks 69th and Sri Lanka ranks 72nd of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.