New Caledonia vs Sudan: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area
New Caledonia
42.81 ha
in 2024
Sudan
85.51 ha
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
67th
Sudan rank
65th
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area over time
- New Caledonia
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 85.51 ha against 42.81 ha in New Caledonia, a difference of 42.7 ha.
That makes Sudan's figure about 2.0 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 67th and Sudan ranks 65th of 218 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 345.2 ha | 66.8 ha | 278.4 ha | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 25.69 ha | 179.56 ha | 153.87 ha | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, New Caledonia or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 85.51 ha against 42.81 ha in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area between New Caledonia and Sudan?
- 42.7 ha, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do New Caledonia and Sudan rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area?
- New Caledonia ranks 67th and Sudan ranks 65th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.