Puerto Rico vs Sri Lanka: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area
Puerto Rico
0 ha
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 ha
in 2024
Puerto Rico rank
72nd
Sri Lanka rank
72nd
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area over time
- Puerto Rico
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 72nd and Sri Lanka ranks 72nd of 218 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 60.97 ha | 1,291 ha | 1,230 ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 2.05 ha | 190.17 ha | 188.12 ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 4.28 ha | 51.3 ha | 47.02 ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, Puerto Rico or Sri Lanka?
- Puerto Rico, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area between Puerto Rico and Sri Lanka?
- 0 ha, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Sri Lanka?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Puerto Rico and Sri Lanka rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area?
- Puerto Rico ranks 72nd and Sri Lanka ranks 72nd of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.