Australia vs New Caledonia: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per capita (Area capita)

Australia
0.0001 ha per person
in 2024
New Caledonia
0.0001 ha per person
in 2024
Australia rank
46th
New Caledonia rank
47th

Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per capita (Area capita) over time

  • Australia
  • New Caledonia
00.0020.0040.006199020072024

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0001 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 ha per person.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Australia ranks 46th and New Caledonia ranks 47th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0011 ha per person 0.0016 ha per person 0.0005 ha per person New Caledonia
2000s 0.001 ha per person 0.0011 ha per person 0.0001 ha per person New Caledonia
2010s 0.0012 ha per person 0.001 ha per person 0.0002 ha per person Australia
2020s 0.0004 ha per person 0.0001 ha per person 0.0003 ha per person Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, per capita, Australia or New Caledonia?
Australia, at 0.0001 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area, per capita between Australia and New Caledonia?
0 ha per person, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Caledonia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Caledonia rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area, per capita?
Australia ranks 46th and New Caledonia ranks 47th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs New Caledonia: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-per-capita/australia/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-per-capita/australia/new-caledonia/">Australia vs New Caledonia: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per capita
Unit
ha per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 6,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Humid tropical forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.