China vs Sudan: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per capita (Area capita)
China
0 ha per person
in 2024
Sudan
0 ha per person
in 2024
China rank
64th
Sudan rank
61st
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per capita (Area capita) over time
- China
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in China, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Sudan's figure about 5.9 times China's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
China ranks 64th and Sudan ranks 61st of 185 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, per capita, China or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area, per capita between China and Sudan?
- 0 ha per person, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do China and Sudan rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area, per capita?
- China ranks 64th and Sudan ranks 61st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.