How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka?

34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burkina Faso vs Sri Lanka: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area)

Burkina Faso

0 ha per square kilometre

in 2023

Sri Lanka

0 ha per square kilometre

in 2023

Burkina Faso rank

60th

Sri Lanka rank

60th

Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) over time

Burkina Faso
Sri Lanka

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 0 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 ha per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 60th and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burkina Faso	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0407 ha per square kilometre	0.0206 ha per square kilometre	0.0202 ha per square kilometre	Burkina Faso
2000s	0.0063 ha per square kilometre	0.003 ha per square kilometre	0.0033 ha per square kilometre	Burkina Faso
2010s	0 ha per square kilometre	0.0008 ha per square kilometre	0.0008 ha per square kilometre	Sri Lanka
2020s	0 ha per square kilometre	0 ha per square kilometre	0 ha per square kilometre	—

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Sri Lanka?: Burkina Faso, at 0 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area, per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka?: 0 ha per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area, per square kilometre?: Burkina Faso ranks 60th and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Sri Lanka: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/sri-lanka/">Burkina Faso vs Sri Lanka: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit: ha per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 6,179 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

Humid tropical forest — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.