China vs Ecuador: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area)

China
0 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
0.0009 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
59th
Ecuador rank
56th

Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) over time

  • China
  • Ecuador
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.005199020062023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.0009 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.0009 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 188.7 times China's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.

China ranks 59th and Ecuador ranks 56th of 185 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 0 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 ha per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.0001 ha per square kilometre 0.0006 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 ha per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 ha per square kilometre 0.0013 ha per square kilometre 0.0013 ha per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 ha per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, per square kilometre, China or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 0.0009 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area, per square kilometre between China and Ecuador?
0.0009 ha per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Ecuador?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China and Ecuador rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area, per square kilometre?
China ranks 59th and Ecuador ranks 56th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Ecuador: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/china/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/china/ecuador/">China vs Ecuador: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 6,179 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Humid tropical forest — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.