China vs Puerto Rico: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area)

China
0 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico
0 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
59th
Puerto Rico rank
60th

Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) over time

  • China
  • Puerto Rico
00.010.020.03199020062023

How they compare

China currently reports 0 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 ha per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

China ranks 59th and Puerto Rico ranks 60th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1990s 0 ha per square kilometre 0.0069 ha per square kilometre 0.0068 ha per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2000s 0.0001 ha per square kilometre 0.0002 ha per square kilometre 0.0002 ha per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2010s 0 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 ha per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2020s 0 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, per square kilometre, China or Puerto Rico?
China, at 0 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area, per square kilometre between China and Puerto Rico?
0 ha per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Puerto Rico?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China and Puerto Rico rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area, per square kilometre?
China ranks 59th and Puerto Rico ranks 60th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Puerto Rico: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/china/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/china/puerto-rico-us/">China vs Puerto Rico: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 6,179 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Humid tropical forest — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.