Singapore vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area)

Singapore
0 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore rank
60th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
60th

Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) over time

  • Singapore
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.0050.010.015199020062023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 ha per square kilometre.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

Singapore ranks 60th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 60th of 185 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0033 ha per square kilometre 0.0067 ha per square kilometre 0.0034 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.0002 ha per square kilometre 0.0012 ha per square kilometre 0.0011 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre —
2020s 0 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, per square kilometre, Singapore or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Singapore, at 0 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area, per square kilometre between Singapore and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 ha per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Turks and Caicos Islands?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Singapore and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area, per square kilometre?
Singapore ranks 60th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 60th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/singapore/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/singapore/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Singapore vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 6,179 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Humid tropical forest — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.