South Africa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area)

South Africa
0.0001 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
57th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
60th

Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) over time

  • South Africa
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.0050.010.015199020062023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.0001 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0001 ha per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

South Africa ranks 57th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 60th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0.001 ha per square kilometre 0.0067 ha per square kilometre 0.0056 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.0007 ha per square kilometre 0.0012 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.0007 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre 0.0007 ha per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 0.0001 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 ha per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher humid tropical forest — burned area, per square kilometre, South Africa or Turks and Caicos Islands?
South Africa, at 0.0001 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burned area, per square kilometre between South Africa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0001 ha per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for humid tropical forest — burned area, per square kilometre?
South Africa ranks 57th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 60th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/turks-and-caicos-islands/">South Africa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Humid tropical forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 6,179 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Humid tropical forest — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.