Australia and New Zealand vs Cuba: Humid tropical forest: Burning crop residues … Burning annual
Australia and New Zealand
-77.09 % change on previous year
in 2024
Cuba
-64.06 % change on previous year
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
70th
Cuba rank
68th
Humid tropical forest: Burning crop residues … Burning annual over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports -64.06 % change on previous year against -77.09 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 13.03 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 22 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Cuba ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 70th and Cuba ranks 68th of 97 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Cuba in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24.35 % change on previous year | 6.11 % change on previous year | 18.24 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2000s | 81.4 % change on previous year | 76.15 % change on previous year | 5.25 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2010s | 37.07 % change on previous year | 7.02 % change on previous year | 30.05 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | 38.67 % change on previous year | 81.32 % change on previous year | 42.65 % change on previous year | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), Australia and New Zealand or Cuba?
- Cuba, at -64.06 % change on previous year against -77.09 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Australia and New Zealand and Cuba?
- 13.03 % change on previous year, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Cuba?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Cuba rank globally for humid tropical forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 70th and Cuba ranks 68th of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.