Australia vs Cuba: Humid tropical forest: Burning crop residues … Burning annual

Australia
-77.09 % change on previous year
in 2024
Cuba
-64.06 % change on previous year
in 2024
Australia rank
70th
Cuba rank
68th

Humid tropical forest: Burning crop residues … Burning annual over time

  • Australia
  • Cuba
0200400600199120072024

How they compare

Cuba currently reports -64.06 % change on previous year against -77.09 % change on previous year in Australia, a difference of 13.03 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 22 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Cuba ahead.

Australia ranks 70th and Cuba ranks 68th of 97 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Cuba in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Cuba Difference Ahead
1990s 24.35 % change on previous year 6.11 % change on previous year 18.24 % change on previous year Australia
2000s 81.4 % change on previous year 76.15 % change on previous year 5.25 % change on previous year Australia
2010s 37.07 % change on previous year 7.02 % change on previous year 30.05 % change on previous year Australia
2020s 38.67 % change on previous year 81.32 % change on previous year 42.65 % change on previous year Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher humid tropical forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), Australia or Cuba?
Cuba, at -64.06 % change on previous year against -77.09 % change on previous year in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Australia and Cuba?
13.03 % change on previous year, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Cuba?
32 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Australia and Cuba rank globally for humid tropical forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
Australia ranks 70th and Cuba ranks 68th of 97 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Cuba: Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/australia/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/australia/cuba/">Australia vs Cuba: Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
121 places, 3,453 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.