Burkina Faso vs Sri Lanka: Humid tropical forest: Burning crop residues … Burning annual

Burkina Faso
-100 % change on previous year
in 2012
Sri Lanka
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Burkina Faso rank
75th
Sri Lanka rank
75th

Humid tropical forest: Burning crop residues … Burning annual over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Sri Lanka
-2000200400600199120042017

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 75th and Sri Lanka ranks 75th of 97 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 40.77 % change on previous year 73.71 % change on previous year 32.94 % change on previous year Sri Lanka
2000s -69.67 % change on previous year -83.11 % change on previous year 13.43 % change on previous year Burkina Faso
2010s -100 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher humid tropical forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), Burkina Faso or Sri Lanka?
Burkina Faso, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka as of 2012.
What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka?
0 % change on previous year, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka?
12 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
How do Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka rank globally for humid tropical forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
Burkina Faso ranks 75th and Sri Lanka ranks 75th of 97 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Sri Lanka: Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/burkina-faso/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/burkina-faso/sri-lanka/">Burkina Faso vs Sri Lanka: Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
121 places, 3,453 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.